nap-1412845_1920

HERTFORDSHIRE, England — Many people turn to “power naps” in the afternoon as a quick means of re-boosting energy levels, but it turns out they may provide other benefits. Napping for less than 30 minutes a day may make you happier, a new study finds.

Psychologist Richard Wiseman, a professor at the University of Hertfordshire, surveyed 1,000 people on their happiness levels and categorized them based on whether or not they napped. People who didn't nap at all were dubbed “No Nappers”; those who napped for under 30 minutes were labeled “Short Nappers”; and anyone who snoozed for more than 30 minutes was considered a “Long Napper.”

Man taking a nap outside
Need a jolt of happiness? Taking a short nap each day might just be what the doctor ordered, a new study finds.

Wiseman determined that 66% of the Short Nappers classified themselves as happy, compared to just 56% of Long Nappers and 60% of No Nappers.

“Previous research has shown that naps of under 30 minutes make you more focused, productive and creative, and these new findings suggest the tantalising possibility that you can also become happier by just taking a short nap,” says Wiseman in a university news release. “Similarly longer napping is associated with several health risks and again, this is in line with our results.”

Interestingly, the youngest participants — those 18 to 30 — may be the least happy of the group. Forty-three percent indicated that they regularly took the potentially-unhealthy longer naps, as opposed to 30% of participants over 50.

Wiseman also adds that only about 1 in 10 participants were allowed to nap at work, though more than half said they wouldn't mind the option. He suggests more employers consider giving their employees rest during the day as a way to boost productivity — and now, make them even happier on the job.

Wiseman presented his findings earlier this month at the Edinburgh International Science Festival.

Our Editorial Process

EdNews publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on EdNews are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Chris Melore

Editor

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

1 Comment