house wren

House wren. (Credit: Josie Weiss on Unsplash)

RALEIGH, N.C. — Artificial light during nighttime, commonly referred to as “light pollution,” has long been known to endanger migratory birds by disorienting them and causing deadly collisions with buildings. North Carolina State University researchers, however, have revealed this type of pollution is also affecting the survival of some backyard bird species around Washington D.C.

Leaning on two decades of data collected by both experts and community scientists through the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center's program, researchers discovered a connection between increased light pollution and decreased survival rates for the gray catbird and house wren. However, the American robin seemed to benefit, with its survival rates rising with increased artificial light.

“This study focused on more generalist bird species that are more abundant in metropolitan areas than others,” says study lead author Lauren Pharr, a graduate student in North Carolina State’s Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology program, in a university release. “These findings are raising awareness about our use of light, and suggest there may be things we can do to help backyard birds that live around us. When it comes to light pollution specifically, there may be things we can do as humans to increase bird survival and help them thrive.”

Researchers utilized data from the Neighborhood Nestwatch Program, spanning 2000 to 2020. Within the program, biologists captured and tagged birds across 242 locations in both urban and rural areas around Washington D.C., primarily in private backyard settings. The primary subjects of this research were seven songbird species commonly found in the area, which, as Pharr pointed out, “can persist” despite the pressures of urbanization.

catbird sitting on a wood surface
Photo by Tyler Jamieson Moulton from Unsplash

By integrating this data with maps showcasing light and noise pollution and paved surfaces, researchers could discern patterns in bird survival. Noise pollution didn't seem to affect survival rates, but light did, particularly for the gray catbird, house wren, and robin.

“This is an important finding; it adds to our understanding that light pollution could have sub-lethal effects on birds,” notes study co-author Caren Cooper, professor of public science at North Carolina State. “There is an effort in bird conservation to keep common birds common. We’re lucky we have backyard birds, and we want to keep it that way. If there are things we can understand about the environment that could be affecting their survival, the sooner we can understand that, the better.”

While the American robin has been observed to use light pollution to its advantage, such as singing earlier in the day, which could aid in mate-finding or foraging, the gray catbird has been known to be more vulnerable, especially to collisions.

“There are so many factors that affect a bird’s survival in an urban setting, and they’re all intertwined, affecting predation, physiological harms, and the ability to find prey,” explains Cooper. “Detecting patterns in avian survival rates that vary with artificial light at night is important, and we need more detailed follow-up studies about why that might be happening.”

The study is published in the journal Urban Ecosystems.

You might also be interested in: 

About EdNews Staff

EdNews sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences — without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. EdNews Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a ED News staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.

Our Editorial Process

EdNews publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on EdNews are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Chris Melore

Editor

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

10 Comments

  1. D C M says:

    Everything we do is wrong.

    1. John novak says:

      Why don’t you have us all go with no electricity or cars and any other technology we need to do away with and we can drive horse and buggies go down and beat our clothes on a rock by the river and live like it’s the 1800’s

  2. Jay says:

    Innit

  3. Carol says:

    John Novak. Your comment is ill-informed and rather ignorant. No one is asking people to go without lights, but we can all do a bit better by our feathered friends by not making our yards look overly lit up overnight!

  4. Dude says:

    Poor Birds. 😪

  5. Dee says:

    Hopefully this only happens during the that time of the year. What about the lights in the big cities? They are humongous - “Bright Lights _ Big Cities?”

  6. Sharon Boyer says:

    I live in York, PA. I have wrens and catbirds....lots of them.

  7. Jim says:

    Bs

  8. Dieter says:

    Honkey white suburbs ruin the world

  9. Junie says:

    The people who move “out to the country” put up ridiculously bright yard lights. Wish they'd be more thoughtful or just stay in town. And yes, all my lights are off at night.