Woman holding red heart and stethoscope

(Credit: New Africa/Shutterstock)

GOTHENBURG, Sweden — Imagine if you could assess your risk of heart disease from the comfort of your own home — without expensive tests or doctor visits. This may soon be possible, thanks to an innovative self-report tool developed by researchers in Sweden.

Heart disease remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide, often striking without warning. While we know certain factors increase risk - like smoking, high blood pressure, and diabetes - identifying who is truly at high risk has been challenging. Traditionally, doctors have relied on blood tests and complex risk calculators. More recently, advanced imaging of the heart's arteries has proven highly effective at spotting early signs of disease. However, these scans are expensive, involve radiation exposure, and aren't feasible to perform on everyone.

Enter the Swedish CardioPulmonary BioImage Study (SCAPIS), an ambitious research project that has scanned the hearts of over 30,000 Swedes between the ages of 50 and 64. Using this treasure trove of data, researchers developed a simple questionnaire that can identify people with significant buildup in their heart arteries - without any fancy tests or doctor visits.

The questionnaire asks about 14 easy-to-answer items, including age, sex, weight, smoking history, and whether you take medications for blood pressure or cholesterol. Remarkably, this self-report tool performed nearly as well as a more comprehensive clinical assessment that included blood tests and physical exams.

How well did it work? The self-report questionnaire correctly identified about 65% of people who had moderate to severe plaque buildup in their heart arteries. This level of plaque is associated with a significantly higher risk of future heart attacks.

To put this in perspective, if you gave this questionnaire to 100 people and then performed heart scans on the 30 highest-scoring individuals, you'd catch about two-thirds of all the people with concerning levels of plaque. You'd only need to scan three to four people to find one high-risk individual.

“A heart attack often comes out of the blue,” says Göran Bergström, Professor of Clinical Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, in a media release. “Many of those who suffer heart attacks are apparently healthy and asymptomatic, but have fatty deposits in the coronary arteries, known as atherosclerosis. Our test makes it possible to identify almost two-thirds of people aged 50–64 who have significant coronary atherosclerosis and are therefore at high risk of cardiovascular disease.”

Cholesterol plaque in artery with Human heart anatomy
Cholesterol plaque in artery with human heart anatomy (© Rasi - stock.adobe.com)

This tool could revolutionize how we approach heart disease prevention. Instead of waiting for symptoms or relying on occasional doctor visits, people could easily assess their risk at home. Those identified as high-risk could then be prioritized for more intensive evaluation and earlier preventive treatments.

The questionnaire performed particularly well for women and people over 55. Interestingly, it was equally effective across different education levels and socioeconomic backgrounds, suggesting it could be a fair and accessible screening tool for diverse populations.

While the tool is not yet ready for widespread use - it needs further testing in different populations - it represents an exciting step towards more personalized and proactive heart disease prevention.

The researchers envision a future where people could take this questionnaire online or via a smartphone app. High-scoring individuals might then be invited for more thorough evaluations, including heart scans. This targeted approach could lead to earlier interventions for those most at risk, potentially saving lives and reducing the overall burden of heart disease.

Of course, this tool isn't meant to replace doctor visits or other health screenings. Rather, it offers a simple first step to identify who might benefit most from more intensive evaluation. It's also important to remember that a low score doesn't guarantee you're free from heart disease risk - it just means your risk is lower based on these particular factors.

As we continue to search for ways to combat the global burden of heart disease, this Swedish study offers a glimmer of hope. By harnessing the power of big data and focusing on easily obtainable information, we may be on the cusp of a new era in personalized heart health assessment. The day when checking your heart disease risk is as simple as checking your email may not be far off.

The research behind the test is published in the Journal of the American Heart Association.

Methodology

The researchers analyzed data from over 25,000 participants in the SCAPIS study who had undergone detailed heart scans. They used machine learning techniques to identify which factors were most predictive of having significant plaque buildup in the heart arteries.

They then developed two prediction tools: a self-report tool using only information that could be easily reported by an individual and a clinical tool that also included data from blood tests and physical exams. The performance of these tools was tested both within the original study population and in a separate validation group.

Key Results

The self-report tool, which included 14 factors such as age, sex, weight, and smoking history, performed remarkably well. It correctly identified 65% of individuals with moderate to severe coronary plaque when focusing on the top 30% of highest-scoring individuals. This performance was nearly as good as the more comprehensive clinical tool. Both tools outperformed existing risk calculators like the Pooled Cohort Equation. The tools worked particularly well for women and individuals over 55.

“The results show that our home test is as accurate as a clinic examination using blood tests and blood pressure measurements,” continues Prof. Bergström. “If we can make the test widely available within healthcare, it can save lives and prevent suffering by helping us to identify those who are at high risk of heart attack or who are currently undertreated.”

Study Limitations

The study was conducted in a Swedish population, so the results may not apply equally to other ethnic groups or regions. The tool hasn't been tested prospectively to see if it actually predicts future heart attacks, only the presence of plaque. There's also a risk that self-reported data might be less accurate than information collected in a clinical setting. Finally, while the tool performed well across different socioeconomic groups in this study, there could be unforeseen biases when applied more broadly.

Discussion & Takeaways

This study represents a potentially significant advance in how we approach heart disease prevention. By using easily obtainable information, it may be possible to identify high-risk individuals who would benefit most from further evaluation and early intervention. This could lead to more targeted and cost-effective screening programs. However, the researchers emphasize that this tool is not meant to replace comprehensive medical care.

Rather, it could serve as an initial step in a more nuanced approach to heart health assessment. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in diverse populations and to determine if this approach actually leads to better health outcomes in the long run. Nonetheless, this research opens up exciting possibilities for more personalized and accessible heart disease prevention strategies.

About EdNews Staff

EdNews sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences — without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. EdNews Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a ED News staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.

Our Editorial Process

EdNews publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on EdNews are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Chris Melore

Editor

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

Leave a comment