zoom computer bored

(Credit: Andrea Piacquadio from Pexels)

ESPOO, Finland — Glossy eyes and big yawns are a common sight during video chats and Zoom meetings nowadays. While prior research has suggested that video chats tire people out so quickly because they're stressful, a new study finds many people may be going about their remote work all wrong. Moreover, video chats appear to promote mental underload as opposed to information overload.

Put another way, study authors from Aalto University explain that drowsiness during online meetings largely stems from a lack of mental stimulation and boredom.

“I expected to find that people get stressed in remote meetings. But the result was the opposite – especially those who were not engaged in their work quickly became drowsy during remote meetings,” says Assistant Professor Niina Nurmi, who led the study, in a university release.

To reach these findings, researchers gauged heart rate variability during virtual meetings and face-to-face meetings, examining numerous varieties of fatigue experiences among 44 knowledge workers across close to 400 meetings. Then, the team at AU worked with scientists at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, where heart rate monitors are routinely used to study stress and recovery.

“We combined physiological methods with ethnographic research. We shadowed each subject for two workdays, recording all events with time stamps, to find out the sources of human physiological responses,” Prof. Nurmi explains.

Video meeting or Zoom call between co-workers
Anna Shvets / pexels.com

This project also included a questionnaire aimed at identifying people's general attitudes and work engagement levels.

“The format of a meeting had little effect on people who were highly engaged and enthusiastic about their work. They were able to stay active even during virtual meetings. On the other hand, workers whose work engagement was low and who were not very enthusiastic about their work found virtual meetings very tiring,” Prof. Nurmi continues.

Study authors explain that it's naturally much easier to maintain our focus during in-person face-to-face meetings in comparison to virtual get-togethers. Video chats simply feature limited cognitive cues and sensory input.

“Especially when cameras are off, the participant is left under-stimulated and may start to compensate by multitasking,” Prof. Nurmi notes.

While an appropriate level of stimulation is generally considered beneficial to the brain, multitasking during virtual meetings is seen as problematic. Only highly automated tasks, like walking, can be properly completed during a virtual meeting.

“Walking and other automated activities can boost your energy levels and help you to concentrate on the meeting. But if you're trying to focus on two things that require cognitive attention simultaneously, you can't hear if something important is happening in the meeting. Alternatively, you have to constantly switch between tasks. It’s really taxing for the brain,” Prof. Nurmi concludes.

The study is published in the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.

You might also be interested in:

About John Anderer

Born blue in the face, John has been writing professionally for over a decade and covering the latest scientific research for EdNews since 2019. His work has been featured by Business Insider, Eat This Not That!, MSN, Ladders, and Yahoo!

Studies and abstracts can be confusing and awkwardly worded. He prides himself on making such content easy to read, understand, and apply to one’s everyday life.

Our Editorial Process

EdNews publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on EdNews are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Chris Melore

Editor

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor